haha...look: Time and causality have an interesting relationship. We understand that time passes because we observe a difference in current conditions in relation to conditions which we remember to exist prior to the change. We perceive correlations to other conditions changed and unchanged to deduce which perceptions are accurate and which are flawed recollections, illusions, etc.

Cellular Synchronization

Communications is another major factor in the perception of time - consensus; consensual time measurement in the form of standardized rhythms and oscillations. Periodicity and synchronization. Piezoelectric regularity is used to augment our perception of our own circadian sensations. We have exploited mechanical, nuclear, and gravitational constants through our understanding of matter, of physics to invoke a computerized cellular geosynchronous agreement throughout the colonized intellects of the multi-giga-posthominid human family.

Perception and Sense of Time

In the same way our individual multi-giga-neurocyte nervous system is yoked together by touch and by common biochemical languages. Perception is a consensus of sensations, will is a consensus maker - a synchronizer which causes the pattern. Consciousness is made of causality itself. Which is why we don't observe change directly, we infer it from the evidence of our senses, intellect, and communication. Deprived of those things, our 'sense of time' wanes, because we don't really have a sense of time (we are time) beyond the experience of movement, stasis, and memory.

Send Craig an Email at whatson@silcom.com

Comments on Perception

Craig, you say that perception is the consensus of geosynchronous agreement and that Will is the synchronizer. But doesn't that statement assume that the agreement was the effect of the shared senses we organize our reality around How do we distinguish cause from effect? How do we tease time away from the senses, and lay bare the evidence before it was evidence? It occurs to me that if Will creates resonance (synchronicity) and we see through the lens of our pooled circadian rhythms then with momentum and agreement, we could change the lens and "re-write" the perception. If we could, would we find that the evidence may in fact not be the result, but rather the cause? The very skeleton of our proof is fundamental to prove its existent and we make evident by our senses. Link to More Reading The Roots of Consciousness - J Mishlove, PhD Coming Soon: The Spacious Present